I used his playbook while I was a high school English teacher for a few years. But his significance goes beyond diagnosis to include prescription. They observed how jump cuts, music, and pacing distorted the truth. Because Postman presented media as a choice rather than a fate, those lessons stuck. After filming fictitious newscasts, children compared the final cut to the transcript. We examined phones instead of outlawing them. He advised us to become aware of the media and to consider the demands made of us by any tool.
When a student rewrote a Shakespearean soliloquy into a thirty-second reel, the class laughed and then fell silent as they realized how much subtlety had been lost. Postman thought that the advancement of technology had an impact on the development of communication as literacy and communication both changed. People read and wrote more when they used technology. Therefore, media had an impact on technology-based communication. Postman would concur that humanity is constantly evolving.
We never stop evolving. According to Postman, media has been a tool for communication and literacy since the beginning of time. Literacy developed alongside media and technology. As a result of our constant search for innovative ways to improve our communication abilities, new technologies were developed. His writings are still a useful guide for comprehending the intricacies of our media-rich culture, far from being out of date.
Seeing the world through his eyes has given me a better understanding of how to deal with contemporary issues. His critiques of entertainment-driven communication, his defense of childhood, his skepticism toward unexamined technology, and his call for thoughtful education all resonate in the digital era. Neil Postman is still relevant today because of his timeless observations about how media environments influence culture.
He believed that technology would undermine education itself. What were Postman's concerns for society? To replace these social virtues with competition, self-aggrandizement, and materialism, Postman felt, had dire consequences. According to him, technocrats are the priesthood of technology, which has become society's new religion. Do we feel at ease letting them dictate how our society operates? Is losing our independence really worth it? It's critical to consider whether we are prepared to pay the cost of these tools in a world where technological progress is no longer debatable.
I've learned to think things through before taking information at face value as someone who has successfully transitioned from traditional media to digital platforms. - a society that prioritizes technology - are becoming more and more pertinent. Individuality and human connection may be lost as a result of the relentless pursuit of efficiency and convenience. Postman's work also emphasized the importance of critical thinking in a media-saturated world.